Internet-based TV apps could face new regulatory requirements in India under proposals from the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). The regulator has recommended an authorisation framework for services that stream scheduled television channels over the internet. The plan also covers Free Ad-Supported Streaming Television (FAST) services. However, the government has yet to decide whether to adopt these recommendations.
Internet-based TV apps may need authorisation
TRAI has proposed a formal authorisation system for eligible internet-based TV apps. The regulator recommends a one-time entry fee of ₹1 lakh and an application processing fee of ₹10,000.
Under the proposal, providers would receive an initial authorisation lasting 20 years. They could then apply for renewals in successive 10-year periods. TRAI has also recommended waiving authorisation fees, bank guarantees and security deposits.
The regulator wants to classify these services as a separate category under the broadcasting authorisation framework of the Telecommunications Act, 2023. An online portal would handle applications, channel registration and reporting.
These measures aim to establish a clearer regulatory framework for internet-based television distribution.
Which internet-based TV apps would the rules cover?
The proposed framework covers applications and websites that distribute scheduled television channels over the public internet or other internet protocol-based networks. Viewers can access these services through smartphones, smart TVs and other connected devices.
The framework would also cover internet-native linear television channels, subject to the proposed registration requirements. Some services may offer on-demand programmes alongside their scheduled channels.
TRAI has recommended excluding broadcaster-owned platforms that distribute only their own channels or those of their subsidiaries or holding companies. Live streams on social media platforms would also remain outside the proposed framework.
These distinctions could determine which services need authorisation if the government adopts the recommendations.
Smart TVs could face new app requirements
TRAI has proposed new obligations for smart-TV manufacturers and operating-system providers. These companies would need to ensure their devices and app stores offer only authorised applications covered by the framework.
The regulator has also recommended that the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting maintain a central repository of authorised internet-based TV apps. Smart-TV manufacturers and operating-system providers would submit annual compliance reports to the ministry.
In addition, authorised providers would distribute only television channels that hold valid government permission, authorisation or registration.
If the government adopts these proposals, the rules could change how some streaming applications reach Indian viewers.
Consumer protection and TV audience measurement
The proposed framework also addresses consumer complaints. TRAI wants each application provider to serve as the primary contact for complaints and grievance redressal related to its service.
The regulator has also recommended including television viewership through these apps in the existing audience measurement framework. Authorised providers could publish anonymised periodic viewing data under the TV Ratings Policy, 2026.
These measures could help regulators assess how audiences consume scheduled television online. They could also create a more consistent process for handling consumer complaints.
What happens next for internet-based TV apps?
TRAI issued its recommendations on October 26, 2026, following a consultation process. The regulator received 207 comments and 11 counter-comments before holding an open-house discussion in June.
The recommendations now go to the government for consideration. Their impact will depend on the final decisions and any rules that officials formally notify.
For internet-based TV apps, smart-TV manufacturers and viewers, the next step is to watch for an official government response. Until then, the proposed authorisation fees and compliance requirements should not be treated as rules already in force.
